🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are observing closely to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a increasing group of countries are considering similar measures.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that phones and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". The policy is expected to be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban is "an tools on the table".
• In Spain, the president has called on parliament to enact a proposal increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised families to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory resolution demanding a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is given. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the step does not create binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a useful foundation," stated a leading MEP supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a future ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "supported by robust evidence".

Previously, momentum built behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the administration pledged to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a girl who died after being exposed to disturbing online content contends that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for minors," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, action is primarily occurring at the local government level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law limiting minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further use dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed measures demanding guardian approval for minors to open social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from certain individuals to copy the Australian path, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Outside of these regions, other countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, global organizations strike a more nuanced tone. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The body points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

While this international discussion unfolds, the steps of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that governments globally are no longer prepared to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.